The
following
is
the
first
in
a
series
of
columns
aimed
at
providing
information
to
our
readers
about
the
conflicts
that
can
develop
between
wildlife
and
humans.
We
will
look
at
all
aspects
of
this
fascinating
topic,
including
preventative
actions
that
you
can
take
to
minimize
potential
problems
with
wildlife,
the
best
known
remedies
available
for
those
who
encounter
wildlife
on
and
off
the
job
and
what
to
do
if
you
suffer
property
damage
by
wildlife.
Generally,
we
will
try
to
find
solutions
to
problems
with
wildlife.
I
am
proud
to
have
been
a
game
warden
in
Alberta
for
18
years
–
a
Regional
Problem
Wildlife
Specialist
for
the
past
four.
I
have
always
pondered
the
true
nature
of
the
role
of
a
Fish
and
Wildlife
officer.
I
believe
most
would
say
our
role
is
simply
to
police
hunting
and
fishing
rules
and
regulations,
but
if
you
ask
any
officer
in
uniform
today,
they
will
tell
you
that
our
days
are
filled
more
with
solving
human/wildlife
conflicts
than
conducting
compliance
checks.
Those
same
officers
will
tell
you
that
it
is
that
diversity
that
is
the
most
appealing
part
of
the
job.
Sure,
the
Fort
Mac
guys
have
had
their
fill
of
trapping
bears
by
the
first
week
of
June,
but
when
the
new
season
roles
around
next
year
they
are
ready
to
do
it
all
over
again.
I
like
the
fact
that
when
I
get
to
work
I
might
go
from
conducting
a
boat
patrol
to
relocating
a
nuisance
bear
all
in
the
same
day.
Predators
and
livestock
producers
have
been
at
odds
for
as
long
as
humans
have
been
keeping
animals.
Throughout
Alberta’s
history
producers
and
government
have
done
their
best
to
curtail
losses
to
predators.
Wolves,
for
example,
have
been
hunted,
trapped
and
poisoned
to
a
population
low
of
approximately
500
animals
in
the
1920s.
Today’s
management
strategies
strive
for
co-existence
with
managed
predator
populations
within
tolerances
for
livestock
losses.
To
assist
in
having
producers
tolerate
some
livestock
losses,
the Alberta
Fish
and
Wildlife
Division
administers
the
Wildlife
Predator
Compensation
Program,
which
pays
producers
of
beef,
sheep,
goats,
pigs
and
bison
for
confirmed
losses
to
black
bear,
grizzly
bear,
cougar,
wolf
and
eagle.
The
program
kicks
into
gear
once
a
producer
reports
a
predator
loss
to
their
local
Fish
and
Wildlife
office.
The
sooner
the
producer
makes
the
call
the
better.
In
turn,
our
officers
will
respond
as
soon
as
practicable.
If
the
officer
is
unable
to
respond
immediately,
the
producer
may
be
directed
to
cover
the
carcass
with
a
tarp
to
prevent
further
scavenging
and
to
preserve
evidence
of
the
attack.
This
is
valuable
information
for
the
investigator
who
is
responsible
for
determining
if
a
predator
is
responsible
for
the
attack
and,
if
so,
the
species
of
predator
involved.
All
predators,
whether
it
is
a
bear,
wolf
or
cougar,
have
preferred
methods
for
attacking
their
prey.
Fish
and
Wildlife
officers
are
trained
to
identify
those
patterns
and
to
determine
the
predator
responsible
for
the
attack.
It
is
vital
that
the
investigating
officer
sees
as
much
of
the
remaining
carcass
as
possible
to
determine
if
the
animal
was
actually
killed
by
a
predator
or
scavenged
upon
after
it
died
of
other
causes.
The
hide
on
the
animal
will
be
skinned
back
to
expose
tooth
marks
and
scratches.
The
officer
will
inspect
for
hemorrhaging
around
the
wounds
that
will
indicate
whether
or
not
the
animal
was
alive
when
the
wounds
were
inflicted.
Spaces
between
the
tooth
marks
can
be
measured
to
help
determine
the
predator
responsible.
The
area
in
the
vicinity
of
the
kill
site
will
be
inspected
for
signs
of
struggle
and
scats
or
tracks.
If
the
investigation
reveals
a
confirmed
loss
to
a
qualifying
predator
(for
example,
losses
to
coyotes
are
not
paid)
the
officer
will
fill
out
a
compensation
claim
form
and
submit
it,
along
with
photographs
and
a
report
of
his
investigation,
to
his
or
her
Regional
Problem
Wildlife
Specialist
(RPWS).
The
RPWS
reviews
the
claim
for
thoroughness
and
accuracy
and
if
he
agrees
with
the
assessment
and
no
other
investigation
is
required,
will
forward
it
to
the
Provincial
Problem
Wildlife
Coordinator
(PPWC)
in
Edmonton
headquarters.
The
PPWC
will
examine
local
livestock
marketing
boards
for
current
market
value
of
the
lost
animal
and
send
a
cheque
for
100
per
cent
of
the
value
of
the
killed
livestock
to
the
producer.
In
some
instances
there
may
be
insufficient
evidence
to
accurately
determine
if
the
livestock
died
as
a
result
of
a
predatory
attack.
If
the
producer
suffers
another
loss
that
is
a
confirmed
predator
kill
within
30
days,
he
may
receive
compensation
for
that
animal
as
well
at
50
per
cent
market
value
of
the
unconfirmed
kill.
In
the
event
that
the
investigating
officer
and
the
producer
are
not
in
agreement
with
the
outcome
of
an
investigation,
the
decision
may
be
taken
to
an
appeal
board
made
up
of
appointed
members
of
the
livestock
community,
the
PPWC
and
a
member
of
Alberta
Agriculture,
Food
and
Rural
Development.
The
cost
of
the
program
varies
from
year
to
year.
Below
are
some
interesting
statistics
for
last
year’s
program
payout.
Wildlife
Predator
Compensation/Shot
Livestock
Compensation
Program
Summary
for
2005-2006
Total
Claims
Received
179
$113,804.42
Claims
Denied
16
Wildlife
Predator
Compensation
Claims
Summary
for
2005-2006
Animal
responsible |
#
of
attacks |
Wolf/Wolves |
121 |
Cougar |
8 |
Black
Bear |
7 |
Grizzly
Bear |
5 |
Unknown |
2 |
Bear |
1 |
Wolf
or
Cougar |
1 |
Eagle |
1 |
Adjustment |
1 |
Denied
14
Total:$97,369.92
Veterinarian
Claims
-
none
(Vet
claims
amount
is
also
counted
in
the
predator
list)
The
money
used
to
pay
for
the
program
comes
from
hunting
licence
sales,
the
WISE
Foundation
and
the
Alberta
Conservation
Association.
Neil
Brad
is
a
member
of
the
Alberta
Game
Warden
Association
in
Smoky
Lake. |